407 Comments
User's avatar
Jennifer's avatar

Nice statement but we need to learn the language of the sound bite. Plus, we need a movement to disbar Vance and Bondi. They are violating their oaths and that step might at least land a punch. Thank you for your work.

Expand full comment
Rachel the Insomniac's avatar

I picture Bondi disbarred and in prison after we defeat this Trump regime. We must defeat it.

Expand full comment
Philip's avatar

Agree completely. We had a respite of four years, experienced normalacy again, and now the rowdy guest has returned to the scene of his last hotel party where he trashed the suite, repeating the same but at a more virgous pace. ENOUGH!!! We do EVERYTHING we can to push back against this authoritarianism. Everything he does is to placate his base of the uninformed, frightened, reactionary, and emotional. It puts the United States on a trajectory to 1890 as government sees the "future" as the past (fossil fuels), while every other country is pursuing cleaner and more efficient use of energy. All our global alliances are cracking as foreign aid is seen as handouts rather than investments. Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa all see the age-old benefits of unity, and as we decline, they will profit handsomely at our expense. This is what you get when you elect a two-bit actor who played a cartoonish "rich guy" character but can't lead a fool of one out of a paper bag stuck on his orange head. I know I am on the right side of decency opposing this cancer, and appreciate the work of all the like-minded people on this site.

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

They are destroying the US government and economy and its citizens’ freedoms on purpose and as bad as I imagine their reasons to be, I am sure it is much worse because it always is.

Expand full comment
Philip's avatar

I certainly agree with you, Jennifer. I think the people in this group are very clear-minded and focused on facts. None of the concerns I have read anywhere here seem remotely alarmist in these times. I was just commenting to a relative about how this cycle of the king seems more uncertain because who knows what motivations are behind him. I don't perceive it as one idiot. There are some really dark forces behind him. I happened to be in a bookstore and noticed a title "Den of Spies" by NY Times reporter Craig Unger who covered a story some time in the 1980s. It involves the hostages held in Iran in the late 1970s. The earliest memory of politics was Reagan's first inauguration, and the release of the hostages. I remember my Mother commented at that time on how this action was an effort to make President Carter look weak. But this book takes it much farther, yet his efforts were vilified by the mainstream media at the time. From the cover notes, Bill Casey was Reagan's Campaign Manager (a role I was unaware that he held because I remember him as the head of CIA). Casey had illegally run a shadow government negotiation with the Iranians to continue holding the hostages until Reagan was elected, and in return they would receive arms....voila, "Iran-Contra" which was headlines in '86 and '87 ad nauseum. I haven't read the book, but it all makes sense, and underscores how despicable the Republicans I once supported have been. Indeed, except for old man Bush, and I am not so sure, I can't name a truly decent Republican President with integrity since Ike. It shows how where we are now has unfolded I was a baby, and indeed, unscrupulous operators like Pat Buchanan and Roger Stone of the Nixon White House have just deficated all over Democracy at their will. They've worked for their own ends and not for the people. But we've reached an impasse. The paleoconservative movement has worked at consolidating power, and laws mean nothing. I notice evidence of an increase in shoplifting (empty packages hidden on shelves; reduced number of self-checkouts etc.) partly because of the chasm between the haves and have-nots, but also because of "leadership" where you can do whatever as long as it is in his interests. Right now, I stay tuned in to headlines, but try to stay at arms length from too much analysis and theorizing. But as a country founded by revolutionaries who were PROGRESSIVE, I see people like ourselves who truly understand what freedom is and have lived it for so long to not cave to an organized crime gang. Honestly, I have real faith, even if these are difficult time for a while. I am convinced that these people are so evil, they are doomed to failure. I also have pleasant daydreams of the administration and billionaire backers experiencing hell, karma, etc. Ever seen shady billionaire Robert Mercer burning as people look on and do nothing? Maybe AI tech can create that warm image from a scan of my brain? ;-)

Expand full comment
Susan H's avatar

Den of Spies is a stunning book, and Unger is a great writer, it reads almost like a novel- very chatty and descriptive, but still pulls all the threads together. Unger chose to have it hit the shelves on President Carter's 100th birthday, and it feels like a real vindication for

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

Old man bush was the Devil, and his reputation and leading us into war with Iraq was the beginning of the end of Reagans legacy.

The media hated Reagan but the people loved him, just like Trump today.

Im just curious, how much news per day to you consume:

a) Television

b) internet

c) social media

d) None

Thank you

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

I dunno I see a straight through line from Nixon and his ill-conceived pardon, to Reagan and his cheating to get elected, to W with the same, right up to trump. The GOP changes the way it cheats every election and the Dems fight the last battle every time. Sigh

Expand full comment
Aquarius Cat's avatar

The people soon learned during the Reagan eight years, trickle-down theory did not trickle down, that Reagin also was anti-union as in firing the Air Traffic Controllers, and his decisions were mostly according to his “star-reading” wife. My retired mother at the time could pay attention to politics, as I was busy supporting my life. Now today, I am retired, now I am all attention to politics, and understand but hate, that those who voted for this deceiver are busy just living.

Expand full comment
Philip's avatar

​Excellent point. I haven't been thinking much about Old man Bush's time in office recently. I well remember Saddaam misreading his ability to invade Kuwait. His buddies Cheney and Rumsfeld were installed in his son's admin to run things, and they were aching for vengeance. I think of how the country was bamboozled into invading Iraq when it was obvious all along there was no justification but personal revenge. I wouldn't quite say that the media hated Reagan, though he certainly did have his opponents. The 1980s is often cited as some sort of golden era in the US, mainly because of bread and circuses, but innumerable problems were conveniently swept under the carpet while the party carried on. News? Depends on the definition of "news". News is what is in the traditional newspaper and not just politics and Washington. My intentional exposure to media is via aggregate sites relying on the driest, solid news from credible news organizations. TV is through unintentional exposure of family members who have it on, and my willingness of the moment to watch PBS, BBC or MSNBC. BBC has always done a proper job in reporting where newsreaders are not the star but conduit for information. Rachel Maddow is really the only MSNBC commentator who I find truly grounded. She's doesn't try to be a personality. I can't believe she that at one point, she was paired on a show with Tucker Carlson. Social media - never.​

Expand full comment
Aquarius Cat's avatar

Remember this cartoonish character said, “I enjoyed the part when I said, You’re fired.”

Expand full comment
Anne Whitney's avatar

Hear hear!

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

Im just curious, how much news per day to you consume:

a) Television

b) internet

c) social media

d) None

Thank you

Expand full comment
Marc Kivel's avatar

I read journalism online, so I do not consume the usual white Reich bs you support....

Expand full comment
Carmen's avatar

No cartoons on that list....you know she's uninformed and uneducated. Probably eats her crayons

Expand full comment
Kathi's avatar

Pretty please 🙏🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment
Ruth Joachim's avatar

Could you elaborate on how the disbarment process could be initiated?

Expand full comment
Anna Baskett's avatar

Agree!! Disbar Vance and Bondi, and another maga attorney that has violated their oath to uphold the law,

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

I agree. Vance and Bondi must be disbarred.

Expand full comment
Darby Z's avatar

I agree. We need to disbar these attorneys NOW...not after the regime is taken down. Otherwise, democracy may not prevail.

Expand full comment
Dawn Reaume's avatar

I was just reading this site and here’s a great letter to our leaders about how to get rid of the entire administration!

https://open.substack.com/pub/ourcivicduty/p/letter-to-our-leaders-the-trump-admin?r=1ygqth&utm_medium=ios

Expand full comment
Susan Fultz's avatar

Don’t leave Trump out of oath violations.

Expand full comment
Robin S Kuykendall's avatar

Yes. Ray is from Missouri? Hawley?

Expand full comment
Kris10's avatar

i agree wuth Jennifer she is right!! sounds like more lip service when we need ACTION!

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

Im just curious, how much news per day to you consume:

a) Television

b) internet

c) social media

d) None

Thank you

Expand full comment
Robin Engel's avatar

6

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

Generally do not get news from places other than news web-sites or substack.

Expand full comment
Katharine Hill's avatar

I can always count on you, Asha, to lift me up. Thank goodness the ABA has spoken. I will spread this message as far and wide as I am able.

Expand full comment
Jim Sanders's avatar

RULE OF LAW

They reckon ill

Who leave it out

When it it flies

IT IS THE WINGS

it is the doubter and the doubt

For the most powerful it sings

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

THE ABA is just like the FDA and the FCC they are all tools of the corporations that use the 'revolving door' to get the lawyers in there and then monopolize the system......

Think of the Oxycontin epidemic that was under Clinton's watch. No one talked about it until last year 30 years later and they make a movie.......

Im just curious, how much news per day to you consume:

a) Television

b) internet

c) social media

d) None

Thank you

Expand full comment
Katharine Hill's avatar

Not quite sure what this post means. The American Bar Association statement seems very clear to me to be an indictment of what the President is doing.

Expand full comment
Pwhitman's avatar

Me too

Expand full comment
Katharine Hill's avatar

Thanks for reminding me of this. It feels so long ago that I commented. Glad all the lawyers and bar associations are continuing to fight.

Expand full comment
hudagai's avatar

Cynicism encourages defeatism.

It allows one to do nothing except complain about a thirty year old unresolved crisis.

Now is the time for good people to unify and encourage each other into action.

Expand full comment
RAISSA's avatar

Imagine if the ABA said nothing. This had to be said. Bravo!

Expand full comment
Deb O'Shea's avatar

Great statement...but....what are the action steps? Where is the call to action? Besides taking a position, coin of the realm these days, what is the ABA doing collectively? I'm a member, and I couldn't find anything on the site. Indivisible is where I'll stay until the ABA is more specific. Still, thank you for sharing.

Expand full comment
Steve Doll's avatar

A class action suit filed on behalf of the American people against the Trump administration and its abettors. It sounds as if we would have the top legal counsel on our side

Expand full comment
Sharon Robino-West's avatar

Let's get moving on the class action suit!

Expand full comment
D Schmitt's avatar

I have thought of that.

However, definition of a manageable protected "Class" is an element of Class certification.

That would be a Court decision.

Not to discourage others, but how would that go?

The transcript:

To address the Court,

Can we define injured individuals in the class as the entire world population?

Excuse me your Honor, I withdraw the question as being much too relevant.

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

On behalf of American people? Wait, didn't the American people elect Trump?

Expand full comment
Ken1's avatar

Trump could not even garner a majority of the popular vote, only a plurality that falls far short of representing a mandate.

Expand full comment
Anne Lesser's avatar

He did not and if you look at all the phony suppression of votes enacted in all State legislatures you might, right now, have a differebt president. And if you are interested in the suppression/presidential outcome, read Greg Palast and then you might want to support a national voting rights reform Now!

Expand full comment
Michael Riley's avatar

To be President, he took an oath to uphold to Constitution. He’s violating it at every turn. Stop trolling.

Expand full comment
Sharon Robino-West's avatar

Not all of us voted for the Cheetoh. I never have and never will. Count on it.

Expand full comment
Carmen's avatar

Only Nazis like you....bimbo.

Expand full comment
Marc Kivel's avatar

No, Elon diddled the vote tabulation as Trumpski publicly admitted, no doubt with Vlad's help....and BTW, tell Vlad he needs to get you remedial American history and political science...your ignorance of America is showing, Natasha.. .

Expand full comment
Beezus's avatar

A minority did

Expand full comment
Jim Sanders's avatar

Plato was adamantly opposed to democracy as he saw how the people can be manipulated—often using religious beliefs—to kill those, like Socrates who supported reason over worshiping the silly mythologies of gods on Mt. Olympus.

I just learned that years later, the same or similar nut jobs convinced the Democratic mob to go after Aristotle offering him the same choice they offered Socrates, exile or death. Aristotle, unlike Socrates, chose exile where he lived 4 or 5 years longer.

Thus, I do not give a damn about “popular” vote if the population is irrational, which our voting public is, IMO.

Expand full comment
Marc Kivel's avatar

Yep, another fragile white right elitist....

Expand full comment
Dawn Andresen's avatar

This is a great idea. Now we need a big law firm to take it on. But the problem is, they would most likely expect to be paid. Who would pay? The muskrat 🐀

Expand full comment
D Schmitt's avatar

Deb O'Shea,

Inaction/delay is the ABA standard on points of contention among the membership.

This statement is, in my opinion, a bit outside the ABA's track record as to clarity, timing and specific target market. A statement desperately needed for counsel and the Court to follow.

I wish J. Eastman, Rudy G. and the J6 legal crew would have had heeded such warnings in Dec. 2020.

Expand full comment
Sarah OBrien's avatar

I agree - this is quite activist for the ABA as a professional organization (not a political sector under ordinary circumstances). They see the flouting of court decisions and injunctions and the constitutional crisis ahead...

Expand full comment
Janet Wilson's avatar

You could contact them and ask exactly these questions.

Expand full comment
Deb O'Shea's avatar

Already on my to-do list today.

Expand full comment
Not Today Satan's avatar

My thoughts exactly. Start disbarment proceedings. File lawsuits against MuskTrump. Take some bold steps!

Expand full comment
AnaMaria🌸's avatar

Thank you… this is what I to am asking and looking for… “A CALL TO ACTION”

We Cannot Wait Any Longer. Where is the Call for “A General Strike!”

Expand full comment
Edie Sadowski's avatar

I am also a member of Indivisible

Expand full comment
Micki Whitaker's avatar

This is a relief! To know that someone somewhere and particularly the ABA is protecting us from the Trump/Musk assault on our country, our democracy and our lives.

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

SO you don't auditing the government is a good idea? Especially after we have a $33 trillion dollar Debt- of which over the last 4 years 3 trillion has gone to:

Mexico - 295 million

Czech Republic - 324 million

Estonia - 334 million

Lithuania - 339 million

Poland - 375 million

Romania - 397 million

Bulgaria - 431 million

Tanzania - 471 million

Pakistan - 536 million

Columbia - 731 million

Philippines -809 million

Somalia - 998 million

Lebanon - 1 billion

Iraq - 2.2 billion

Jordan - 2.3 billion

Afghanistan - 6.1 billion

Egypt - 6.3 billion

Ukraine - 2.6 billion

Israel - 8.5 billion

Expand full comment
Sarah OBrien's avatar

Foreign aid is one of the smallest line items areas in the budget , is overseen in detail by Congress (including reviews of all proposed outlays), and benefits the US by creating and sustaining positive relationships instead of having to impose our will by military means. An audit is fine - though I erkill given strict congressional tracking. But this is an unconstitutional power grab conducted by unvetted and untrained children.

Expand full comment
Marthe du Sud-Ouest's avatar

Also, we don't know what this unelected, unconfirmed uber-oligarch plans to do with *our* taxpayer dollars. Sure looks like theft to me. Congress had already appropriated those monies.

Mechanisms already existed to determine whether there was "fraud." These include the fired inspectors general, the GAO, and the OMB, which are now in the hands of the architects of Project 2025, another faction that explicitly wants a dictatorship.

Expand full comment
Jim Sanders's avatar

“…and benefits the US by creating and sustaining positive relationships instead of having to impose our will by military means.”

Benefits the US? Don’t you mean that it benefits different capitalist who use tax money paid by the American middle class to support those Capitalists buying influence to make more money?

Expand full comment
Sarah OBrien's avatar

No..but you may

Expand full comment
Beezus's avatar

A legitimate audit with qualified people is not a problem. The problem is what they are now doing-is not that. Inexperienced young men recoding complex and sensitive computer systems is not an audit. No security clearance for this group of private citizens who are accessing the country’s most sensitive data is not an audit. Refusing to spend allocated funds is not an audit. Locking out current staff who know these systems is not an audit. Causing chaos and confusion and firing people illegally is not an audit. Not one teeny tiny part of their current actions resemble any type of “audit.” You are being lied to, Tanya. You are being gaslit and I’m sorry about that.

Expand full comment
Ray Reinhard's avatar

There is nothing wrong with legitimate audits.

Expand full comment
Ray Reinhard's avatar

Sending six young hackers with ZERO experience in auditing and accounting, with no comprehension of how government programs is a JOKE. And giving them unrestricted read/write access to the government’s most sensitive and comprehensive data is malfeasance of the highest order.

Expand full comment
Diane's avatar

Of course not. If only that’s what was actually happening🤷‍♀️.

Expand full comment
Michael Riley's avatar

Who said auditing isn’t a good idea? All that is being said is that you must follow the law. You can’t just blow shit up cuz you don’t like it.

Expand full comment
Madge's avatar

AND…why did you only go back 4YEARS??? What about the 7 TRILLION the prior 4 years?? Um I think you’ve got a little something on your forehead there Tanya..

Expand full comment
Diane's avatar

Theyre not really auditing. Theyre just cutting wherever they feel like. You really believe Musk (an imigrant remember) & a group of 20 yr olds are actually “auditing”? Maybe that could be an idea, but that’s not what’s happening. You need to pick up a clue!!

Expand full comment
Tommy McGuire's avatar

Better go back to math class. Besides, take one guess (need a hint?) who got us into this massive debt. (Bzzzzt, sound of buzzer.) Wrong. The correct answer is the GOP and tax cuts for near trillionaires. Are you down with that, Tanya?

Expand full comment
Laurie Thompson's avatar

If they really want to audit the federal government why don’t they start with the DOD? Answer: because the person doing the auditing makes billions from DoD’s budget. This whole thing is a scam to literally loot the government and the American people of their wealth. If you don’t understand that you are part of the problem.

Expand full comment
AnaMaria🌸's avatar

Wondering where did you get your figures? Please give Source used to acquire the information you have presented.

Expand full comment
Carmen's avatar

Trump caused much of that debt in his first term, MAGA MORON.

Expand full comment
Marc Kivel's avatar

Auditing by competent professional auditors is fine...part of what the IGs the Felon in Chief dismissed normally do...but a fraud such as Putie bots (like you) wouldn't know that, white right, Olga Liarovitch?

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

Im just curious, how much news per day to you consume:

a) Television

b) internet

c) social media

d) None

Thank you

Expand full comment
Rebecca Perry's avatar

I’m just curious. WHERE do you get your news?

Expand full comment
Carmen's avatar

She probably can't read or comprehend if it's not in a coloring book.

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

Most news is fabricated propaganda - our worldwide communications are controlled by six different major corporations, and they all seem to have the agenda of destroying America.

Expand full comment
Marc Kivel's avatar

Ah another lying fascist working for the orangeshitgibbon's owner, Vlad Putin...which is why I blocked you.

Expand full comment
Carmen's avatar

BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH ....... BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH........what do you call MAGAt cleaning their ears? A colonoscopy!

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar

“Tanya” should stfu

Expand full comment
Marc Kivel's avatar

She is a President Elon bot....

Expand full comment
Lisa's avatar

Of course she is, that’s why I knew she wouldn’t take offense lol

Expand full comment
Geoff Ireland's avatar

My question is why are these judges, who are issuing TROs, are not issuing arrest warrants for Musk and his little band of miscreants, and, for that matter, the President himself? These people are engaged in a coup. Is that not treason? Is that not about as illegal as it gets?

Expand full comment
Colorado Danielle's avatar

The plaintiffs in some of these cases could file a show cause motion to have Musk/ DOGE held in contempt for continuing to violate TROs. Otherwise, for a federal arrest warrant, DOJ would have to apply for the warrant and the court either grants or denies. With Bondi in charge of DOJ don’t expect any arrest warrants or even investigations of all the civil laws being fragrantly violated.

Expand full comment
Sharon Robino-West's avatar

GREAT QUESTION! And the answer is...?

Expand full comment
Geoff Ireland's avatar

If Bondi herself can be shown to be in contempt of the constitution for condoning the clearly seditious actions of the White House cabal then she too should be impeached and imprisoned. You either have the rule of law or you don’t. It should not be a matter of who is breaking the law but who has the balls to hold them to account. Trump once said he could shoot somebody dead in the middle of Times Square and still get the Republican nomination. He is in the process of committing treason and he and his accomplices are encompassing the deaths of persons uncounted through the essential programs they are cancelling before every witness on the planet with access to the media. The Secret service itself should be placing him and his cohort of miscreants under arrest! Failing that a company of Marines should be clomping into the West Wing or Mar a Lego or wherever the nearest golden toilet is and hauling their asses off to Leavenworth.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 12
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Beezus's avatar

It is not an audit. They are taking illegal and unconstitutional actions. Civics 101.

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

It seems there's a lot of lawyers here and they seem pretty high and mighty and thinking that what they do is important but let's remind ourselves we need farmers and we need chefs and we need firemen and police man but we don't really need lawyers they provide no benefit to society they don't create anything.

That being said, Trump and Elon Musk are not lawyers they're talented, businessmen and entrepreneurs. I think there's a subtle unconscious jealousy that anything they do is something that could've been something you did, but didn't have the courage to strike out on your own.

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

Yes they are and they’re doing it to clean up the mess of the last 15 years since Obama can in and introduced Cultural Marxism to America

Expand full comment
Beezus's avatar

You don’t seem to understand the point. I’ll pray for you.

Expand full comment
Janet Wilson's avatar

Again Tanya, there are legal mechanisms for audits already. And audits are done regularly by every department. The objection here is not doing an audit, it is that unelected, unqualified, private citizens are demanding wholesale, impulsive changes, and have their hands on the Treasury. This opens the door to theft, just for a start, preferment for a second, dictatorship third, and economic let alone global political ruin fourth. I leave aside the threats of war and invasion against your largest trading partners...

Expand full comment
Dennis Bruno's avatar

Clearly government audits are ineffective and mean little. The Dod has failed something like 7 audits running. And multiple lawsuits are currently being filed against defense contractors for overcharging the department for years. I doubt the Dod is the only department with these problems. I don’t see how the door will be open for theft considering an audit will still occur, not related to DOGE. Preferment is already a problem with the revolving door that many departments have. Dictatorship is actually a fair concern but I think relates more the trump then DOGE, and the 4th point is also more of a trump problem while cutting foreign aid programs will hinder political relationships I think the tariffs and unwillingness of the current administration to meet with foreign allied leaders is more the problem.

Expand full comment
Janet Wilson's avatar

That is not clear at all. If the legal system presently in place to track any waste, fraud or "abuse" are not up to the task, then THOSE SYSTEMS need to be strengthened. It is not reasonable to say the only alternative is to let an unelected, unqualified, private citizen with conflicts of interest and a questionable history walk in and make wholesale changes.

Expand full comment
Dennis Bruno's avatar

I would not say it is only alternative but these problems have existed for years and not only has nothing changed but no one even seemed concerned. 7 failed audits($824 billion missing just from Dod)should not be possible without a major shift. That is tax money just being stolen and no one cares. There is no reason to think the government will suddenly become effective so bringing in an outside source seems reasonable. Doesn’t need to be Elon but someone who is public enough to bring attention to how shitty our government is at keeping track of its expenses felt needed.

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

The machinations of money laundering is what is killing this country I guess you don't realize that.

Expand full comment
Janet Wilson's avatar

Oh Tanya. If money laundering is the problem, then by all means go after it. But do so by legal means, not this ridiculous slash and burn operation by Musk and Trump. It is a pity the FBI is also being gutted, because tracking and dealing with money laundering is their job. Ergo, this admin has no interest in dealing with your "machinations of money laundering". Likely as they plan to turbocharge it for their own benefit.

Expand full comment
Gene's avatar

Now can you disbar all of the attorneys who are supporting illegal activities in the current administration?

Expand full comment
Susan Linehan's avatar

One apparently actually told some court--can't remember which issue, USAID I think--that the freeze only applied to "future disbursements." However you think of future, it doesn't include money already not disbursed. I hope whoever it is gets reported to his state bar for bald face lies.

Do you think that even Thomas and Alito would go with overruling Marbury vs Madison?

Expand full comment
Pamela Cass's avatar

Thomas would say he had to be an actual witness to Marbury v. Madison. Unlikely, since he'd only be a slave serving a master in court that day. 🤔

Expand full comment
Katherine Melchior Ray's avatar

Thank you Mr. Bay for using your position to affirm what we all can see is outright injustice. My father fled Nazi Germany to arrive in this country at age 13, and paid his way to college by driving a taxi. He eventually graduated from Yale Law School and represented the California Bar Association for decades.

Though he died 2 years ago at 98, he was still working to fight injustice. He would be furious at the administration's illegal actions and doing his part to advocate for the everyman. He believed the US legal system was the world's best; may it prove itself now or forever hold its peace.

Expand full comment
Toni Lucadello's avatar

Thank you for supporting the Rule of Law as it is one of the pillars of Democracy. What can ordinary citizens do to help contine this?

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

But don't we live in a republic?

Expand full comment
Ken1's avatar

Tanya, you are wasting everyone’s time here, especially in repeating many of your own, mostly inane, comments.

Expand full comment
Katharine Hill's avatar

Thank you, Ken1. I was attempting to understand Tanya’s rationale. But obviously a waste of time as you eloquently put it. Moving on . . .

Expand full comment
Janet Puchalski's avatar

Let’s move to disbar those lawyers that aren’t following rule of law.

Expand full comment
Ben Holstrom's avatar

Good. That's what the bar is supposed to do. Let's get at it!

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

Yes, lets censor their comments online too!

Expand full comment
Janet Wilson's avatar

I see from your posted comment that no censorship has taken place. But your comments are inane and provocative for no reason. So the best policy here is for us all to ignore you. That is called "consequences".

Expand full comment
Dennis Bruno's avatar

And yet this lady got a response. How can u justify that in ur head. “Hey if we ignore this maybe it will stop. How can I make this happen…? I guess the best way would be to respond and get one last jab in so she knows she’s definitely not getting to me” what???? Also on a side note really do ignore her this Tanya lady is getting enough hate as is

Expand full comment
Janet Wilson's avatar

Not nearly enough, but point taken.

Expand full comment
Susan J Britt's avatar

Can you not fire the lawyers who are participating in the coup? Disbar them? This is an emergency.!

Expand full comment
MDA's avatar

A worthy statement as far as it goes. Where was the ABA when a whole raft of lawyers were pushing "Stop the Steal"? Where is their defense of their profession against those who use it to push dangerous agendas? This current president has attacked the legal profession, judges and the rule of law ever since he rode down that golden escalator in 2015. It would have been nice to see something like this when he was attacking prosecutors and investigators who were following the rule of law.

Expand full comment
Dee Fellows's avatar

Yale should revoke Vance’s law degree!!

Expand full comment
Tanya's avatar

He's probably part of the skull and bones society. You know the secret society stuff.

Im just curious, how much news per day to you consume:

a) Television

b) internet

c) social media

d) None

Thank you

Expand full comment
Kathi's avatar

E. Substack, politico, AP, and wasaaayyyyyy tooo much of all of it!!! Prior to this election TikTok was my new source😂🤡

Expand full comment
Susan H's avatar

Glad the ABA came out with a strong statement- Judge Coughenour was even more impressive as a Reagan appointee smacking down Trump challenge to birthright citizenship. Joyce Vance linked to this audio of his inspiring statement: https://cms.megaphone.fm/channel/PPY8978309182?selected=SLT1263175437

Expand full comment
Ben Holstrom's avatar

Trump and the Project 25 bandwagon is at an important juncture in the road. One road leads to the rule of law, The other road

leads into the darkness of anarchy. Trump loves chaos.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 12
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Ben Holstrom's avatar

Tanya, that is completely incomprehensible.

Expand full comment
John Taylor's avatar

As I suggested in an earlier post, I emailed the ABA asking them to consider revoking the law licenses of those in this administration who are supposed to be following the law.

When one’s professional livelihood is threatened, one might take pause.

Expand full comment