Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Palmer's avatar

The question can't be answered until we agree on a definition of propaganda. Must there be deception? Must it benefit the speaker? Is it enough that it present only one point of view? Must there be emotional manipulation? Is a Burma Shave sign propaganda? What about Mrs. McKinnon's third-grade class in American history?

The speech was superbly written and skillfully read by an attractive man with a resonant voice to an audience already inclined to hear its message. The message itself was uplifting, and the speaker undoubtedly believed everything he said. But it played on emotions, promised a chicken in every pot, blamed the East for all woes, and took advantage of the deplorable human drive to divide into teams with different-colored jerseys.

David Christy's avatar

When I watched this video I was it occurred to me how different my perception is today as opposed to 35 years ago. Then, I saw our president standing up to the oppressions of the soviets. Today, I see propaganda laced throughout this speech. Was I naive then? Probably. Reagan told the world that the freedoms enjoyed by the west were also desired by those in the east. After all everyone wants what we have don’t they? This speech was designed to show strength and to persuade the world to view us as the ones who are right and the soviets as the ones denying the East Germans. He gave ample examples of our good while being forceful. In the end the speech was persuasive propaganda.

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?